Legally, Polygamy is next

From the looks of this picture, polygamists dress their children nicely.

I don't know much about polygamy, except for what the Church teaches:

[Conjugal] communion is radically contradicted by polygamy; this, in fact, directly negates the plan of God which was revealed from the beginning, because it is contrary to the equal personal dignity of men and women who in matrimony give themselves with a love that is total and therefore unique and exclusive."

Adultery, divorce, polygamy, and free union are grave offenses against the dignity of marriage.

As explained in the Newsweek article, the polygamists and gay-marriage
groups have no love for each other, legally they are on the same free ride:

There's a sound legal argument for making the controversial practice legal, says Brian Barnard, the lawyer for a Utah couple, identified in court documents only as G. Lee Cooke and D. Cooke, who filed suit after being denied a marriage license for an additional wife. Though the case was struck down by a federal court last year, it's now being considered by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, and Barnard plans to use the same argument—that Lawrence v. Texas, the 2003 sodomy case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that individuals have "the full right to engage in private conduct without government intervention," should also apply to polygamous relationships.

link

Almost always, when the legalization of polygamy is brought up, it's used to make a case against gay marriage. Most notably, Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania told the Associated Press in 2003 that legalizing gay sex would pave the way for legalized bigamy, polygamy and incest. This "slippery slope" argument angers some gay-rights activists who see the issues as being completely separate.

"I frankly would not love to see an article [about polygamy advocacy] in NEWSWEEK because this is the connection that our opponents make, and we feel it's a specious one," says Carisa Cunningham, director of public affairs for Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders. Polygamy activists aren't thrilled with the association, either. Though they closely watch the gay-marriage battle, they are generally religious and conservative—and, like Henkel and Hammon, believe that homosexual behavior is a sin.

I don't know what the polygamist atmosphere does to the children as they are
growing up.

But I am very afraid of a little boy in the controling atmosphere of
2 homosexual married men for all the childhood years.

Is there someone who
doesn't know what I mean? I doubt it.

Because the popular culture sees polygamists as religious and conservative,
the legal trail for polygamy will probably be a slow one. It will have none of
the gay agenda demonstration marches and liberal legislators behind it.

But legally, what to stop anything if marriage is not between one man and one
woman? Only the Supreme Court or a constitutional amendment it seems. I hope we
will find out soon.